Ongoing Research

Current Research Projects

Combining quantitative analysis with large historical datasets, Peter Turchin and collaborators study how complex societies evolve, why they periodically enter crisis, and why some recover while others undergo severe breakdown.

Across the past 10,000 years, human societies changed from small-scale, relatively egalitarian groups into large, differentiated societies with extensive divisions of labor, unequal distributions of wealth and power, and elaborate systems of governance. This transformation was neither smooth nor irreversible.

Main Questions

Three problems guide the research program

The first problem is the long-run growth in the scale and organizational complexity of human societies during the past 10,000 years. The second is the recurrent fragility of complex states: why periods of social stress can lead to fragmentation, institutional breakdown, and collapse.

The third problem is comparative resilience. Why do some societies pass through major crises with limited damage while others experience extensive violence, population decline, and the loss of institutions or accumulated knowledge?

Historical Pattern

Social complexity advances unevenly

The long-run growth of social complexity has repeatedly been interrupted by turbulence and dysfunction. Political fragmentation, economic simplification, demographic decline, and institutional loss appear in the histories of many large-scale societies, including modern ones.

Scholars have proposed many explanations for both the rise of complex societies and their breakdown.

Research Approach

Theory tested against comparative historical evidence

At the Complexity Science Hub, the research program combines computational and statistical methods with cultural evolution, historical social science, archaeology, and formal models of collective behavior.

A central empirical resource is Seshat: Global History Databank, co-founded in 2011 by Peter Turchin, Harvey Whitehouse, and Pieter François. Its comparative record makes it possible to evaluate theories of social complexity, resilience, and breakdown across regions and long periods of time.

CSH Projects

Projects and collaborations at the Complexity Science Hub

The CSH research topic Social Complexity & Collapse connects this long-term program to focused projects. The entries below link to the institutional project records; dates distinguish the active program from completed collaborations.

01
AReS: Assessing societal resilience (2026–2028)
An FWF-funded project led by Peter Turchin that compares historical and modern societies to identify the conditions supporting adaptation, collective action, and resilience under severe shocks.
02
Cities and Warfare (ongoing)
A collaboration between the Complexity Science Hub and the University of Hong Kong studying how geography and warfare shaped the rise of cities and complex societies. Building on research into early China, the project is collecting comparative archaeological and historical data for Mesopotamia, Egypt, and other regions.
03
Human Population Cycles (2024)
A collaboration with Epigenes Australia using comparative evidence on population change, warfare, famine, and epidemics to investigate recurring demographic cycles.
04
HuBERT and historical data (2023)
An earlier natural-language-processing project exploring how historical and archaeological literature can be screened and translated into structured, interoperable historical datasets.

Selected Work

Selected work

Selected work connected to this research page.

Book

The Great Holocene Transformation

Sep 17, 2025Turchin, P.

What Complexity Science Tells Us about the Evolution of Complex Societies

Why do the 99.9% of humanity live in large-scale societies organized as states? During the Holocene (the last 10,000 years), human societies have been transformed utterly: from small groups of nomadic foragers to our current interconnected world of large-scale societies organized as states. Population numbers, agricultural productivity, technological…

Beresta BooksSocial ComplexityCooperation
Publication

Multilevel Selection in Cultural Macroevolution

Feb 8, 2026Turchin, P.

Cultural macroevolution (CME) is a subfield of cultural evolution that studies large-scale changes in the cultural traits of whole groups. A central question in CME is how and why characteristics of polities (such as chiefdoms, states, and empires) evolve over time. Multilevel selection, and especially its application to cultural evolution, provides a very useful theoretical framework for CME because many polity-level characteristics evolve under selection pressures that act in opposite directions at different levels of hierarchical organization. In this chapter I discuss the conceptual framework that multilevel selection provides for studying CME and summarize the main empirical results from my recent book (Turchin 2025). I conclude that major predictions of cultural multilevel selection theory enjoy substantial empirical support.

SocArXivCultural EvolutionCooperation
Publication

What is society?

Jul 9, 2026Turchin, P.

This article engages with Mark Moffett’s proposed definition of society, which emphasizes shared group identification over social interaction, and argues for a different, problem-driven approach to definition in evolutionary social science. Rather than treating definitions as primary, I situate them within the broader research agenda aimed at explaining the Great Holocene Transformation—the dramatic expansion of human societies in scale and complexity over the past 10,000 years. My central analytical focus is on cooperation: the capacity of individuals to coordinate actions toward collective goals despite incentives to free-ride. Accordingly, society is defined here as a collective of individuals engaged in sustained cooperation, with interest group proposed as a more flexible and analytically useful term. Within this framework, polities represent a key subtype of interest groups, characterized by their role as independent political units whose persistence depends on maintaining cooperative cohesion, particularly among elites. Other commonly cited features of societies—such as group identification, territoriality, and intergenerational continuity—are treated as secondary mechanisms that support cooperation rather than defining properties. Ultimately, I argue that flexible, operational definitions are most valuable at intermediate stages of scientific inquiry, where they facilitate the construction and empirical testing of theoretical models.

Theory and SocietyCooperationSocial Complexity
Publication

Cliopatria - A geospatial database of world-wide political entities from 3400BCE to 2024CE

Feb 12, 2025James S. Bennett, Erin Mutch, Andrew Tollefson, et al.

The scientific understanding of the complex dynamics of global history – from the rise and spread of states to their declines and falls, from their peaceful interactions with economic or diplomatic exchanges to violent confrontations – requires, at its core, a consistent and explicit encoding of historical political entities, their locations, extents and durations. Numerous attempts have been made to produce digital geographical compendia of polities with different time depths and resolutions. Most have been limited in scope and many of the more comprehensive geospatial datasets must either be licensed or are stored in proprietary formats, making access for scholarly analysis difficult. To address these issues we have developed Cliopatria, a comprehensive open-source geospatial dataset of worldwide states from 3400BCE to 2024CE. Presently it comprises over 1600 political entities sampled at varying timesteps and spatial scales. Here, we discuss its construction, its scope, and its current limitations.

Nature Scientific DataHistorical Databases